<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power in Endorsements or Winning and its Impact on Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.profitmeister.com/index.php/2010/02/power-in-endorsements-or-winning-and-its-impact-on-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.profitmeister.com/index.php/2010/02/power-in-endorsements-or-winning-and-its-impact-on-brand/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=power-in-endorsements-or-winning-and-its-impact-on-brand</link>
	<description>Smart Marketing Strategies (D.I.Y.)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.profitmeister.com/index.php/2010/02/power-in-endorsements-or-winning-and-its-impact-on-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profitmeister.com/?p=1614#comment-774</guid>
		<description>Why are companies such as Accenture tying their brand to people who - um - play games?  It makes sense for - say - a golf ball manufacturer to pay Tiger...totally ridiculous for a &quot;leading&quot; management consultant firm to go so far as to put him on their stationary.  These are not the folks I would  hire to give me advice on business strategy. 

And, why should it be any of our business who Tiger does or doesn&#039;t canoodle with?  While what he did was immoral, it wasn&#039;t illegal and was between consenting adults...The only people he owes an apology to is his family.  

I think Tiger&#039;s brand will be just fine in the long run.  He plays golf and plays it well - which means all will be forgiven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are companies such as Accenture tying their brand to people who &#8211; um &#8211; play games?  It makes sense for &#8211; say &#8211; a golf ball manufacturer to pay Tiger&#8230;totally ridiculous for a &#8220;leading&#8221; management consultant firm to go so far as to put him on their stationary.  These are not the folks I would  hire to give me advice on business strategy. </p>
<p>And, why should it be any of our business who Tiger does or doesn&#8217;t canoodle with?  While what he did was immoral, it wasn&#8217;t illegal and was between consenting adults&#8230;The only people he owes an apology to is his family.  </p>
<p>I think Tiger&#8217;s brand will be just fine in the long run.  He plays golf and plays it well &#8211; which means all will be forgiven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

